Planning Board Meeting
The meeting of the
Hickey opened the Public Comment period.
John O’Neill,
Klepack moved to close the Public Comment period. Seconded by Stycos. All aye.
Public Hearing –
Special Permit No. 1915 – Arleo Institute:
The
next item on the agenda was a Public Hearing for Special Permit No. 1915, Arleo
Eye Institute to construct a 21,680sf medical office building on the lot on the
northwest corner of Warren Road and Uptown Road in the Human Health Services
District, Tax Parcel No. 46.1-6-6.21
Alex
Urda, engineer for Keystone Associates, gave the presentation for Arleo Real
Estate. The project is located on 2.5
acres and the proposal is for a 21,680sf building to be located on the corner
of
Urda stated that the detention ponds will reduce the rate
of storm water discharge to the present levels and water will exit through a 15
inch pipe to the ditch along Uptown Road.
The sewer will exit on the SW corner of the property and will go under
Uptown Road. It is proposed to go under the
detention pond, although it may be shifted away from the berm. This detail will
be reviewed by the Village Engineer.
Hickey
asked for clarification on a traffic control post as noted on the plans. Urda responded that Curtis also noticed
this. It is an error and is meant to
indicate a light pole. A Lighting Plan
will be submitted at a later date. The
current proposal is for 12 lights around the perimeter and 2 lights in the
parking lots. There will also be ballard
lights along the walkways and entrance ways.
Dankert
asked about the hours of operation of the lights. Urda responded that the
lights will cut off at night other than for security. Urda noted that light
spillage would be almost non-existent.
Curtis noted that the Lighting Plan should also include all exterior
lighting including building mounted lights.
Urda
stated that they would like to eliminate the 24 ft. ROW access on the northern
boundary to access the parcel to the north.
The plat indicates that the second parcel can be developed only if the
two parcels are combined or if direct access by a public road is provided for
the second parcel. Arleo does not
currently own the second parcel and there are no plans at this time to combine
the two lots. Hickey felt the previous
owner, Dr. Rubinstein, had planned to use both parcels. The second parcel is now owned by
Cornell.
Leopold
asked about the property line jogging into Warren Road. Urda stated this is
confusing. The survey crew researched
this and the property line does indeed go into the roadway and is described
this way in the deed. Hickey mentioned
that he has a meeting this week with the County Highway Department and will ask
if they are aware of this situation. Urda noted that it is not uncommon in
rural areas for the property lines to go to the center of the road. Urda stated
the proposed project has based the setbacks not on the property lines but on
the r.o.w. boundary.
Leopold
asked about the 25 ft. variable buffer. Urda responded that they would submit
the buffer landscape plan at the next meeting. In addition to that there would
be small landscape plantings around the buildings. There would also be landscaping around the perimeter, as well as
pockets in various areas in the interior.
The
presentation for the proposed building
was made by Henry Cesari, the Project Architect. The 25 ft. variable buffers allows the
project to have front and rear exits and entrances to meet the needs of the
doctors and to allow for emergency transportation without having to take
patients through the waiting areas. The
variable buffer also allows for supplies to be delivered in the rear of the
buildings and will not obstruct the handicapped parking spaces in the
front. The screened entry will also
provide for confidentiality of patients with special needs or for those
transported from incarceration. Plantings are proposed wherever possible
including on the larger islands. The
western border will be planted with possibly a hedgerow of alternating
varieties of pines 15 ft. on center to provide a dense screen in 4-6
years. Berming will be used to enhance
the buffer wherever feasible. Hickey
provided documentation from the Zoning Law which specifically states what
should be planted and in what locations in a buffer strip. Cesari stated it should be possible to meet
all the requirements of the variable buffer strip. Curtis noted the requirement for maintaining
the buffer.
Hickey
asked what the building would actually look like. Cesari then distributed elevations of the
building and noted the roof is proposed to be black. Air conditioning units placed on the roof
must also be screened. The building
exterior will be of natural stone and cedar.
The project has three proposed phases and construction scheduling will
depend on when spaces are leased.
Hickey
stated the Board has enough information for the SEQRA and the Special Permit
approval and conditions can wait until the landscape plan for the buffer is
submitted. The Board would also like to
see a colored rendering of the building proposed for Phase 1.
Hickey
opened the Public Hearing.
John
O’Neill, 53 Janivar Drive, expressed his concern that since there is only about
½ acre not covered by the footprint of the building or paving, will the
detention swales be sufficient to hold the storm water runoff. Urda stated the
swales were modeled on 2% slope and the berms will assist to meet the new
regulations by slowing the water. Hickey
also noted that Engineer Cross needs to review and approve the plans. Urda
stated another swale has been built to assist with runoff and 80% will exit from
one area on the site. The use of berms,
with evergreens as well as deciduous trees, and swales in combination will be
utilized on the site.
As
there was no one else present who wished to speak, Dankert moved to close the
Public Hearing. Seconded by
Klepack. All aye.
Curtis
stated he has spoken with the Fire Chief who was agreeable to the plans and
layout of the parking lot but requested there be three fire hydrants. The locations he proposed for the hydrants
have been given to Urda and will be transposed onto the final plans. Urda
stated the number of fire hydrants seems excessive. Curtis stated the fire department would not
be running a hose across Warren Road and there should only be 150 ft. to the
hydrant. Curtis will discuss this in
more detail with Urda.
Urda
did not have a corrected copy of the SEQRA form with the required signature but
will provide it for the next meeting.
Hickey stated the Board would then transpose the corrected information,
but could proceed with the SEQRA review tonight.
Urda
asked about reducing the width of access lanes in the parking areas from 24 to
20 feet. Hickey stated Engineer Cross
would need to review this and Urda should discuss this with him. Klepack noted that some Board members prefer
less asphalt. Hickey stated the engineer
often bases his recommendation on safety.
Hickey
stated this is an unlisted action and will not receive coordinated review. The
Board proceeded with Part 2 of the SEQRA Environmental Assessment Short
Form. A – no B – No, C1 – No, most items
are covered by the Village Engineer and his approval will be needed for the
Special Permit. There was discussion as
to the location of the driveway in relation to the driveway to the apartments. The driveway to the apartments is closer to
the Swim Club entrance and the proposed driveway for this development is about
100 ft. to the east. C2 – No, it is
within the Zoning District where it is a permitted use and also next to the
Convenient Care Center. C3 – No C4 – It
is in the appropriate Zoning District.
C5 – None C6 – None C7 - None D – No Controversy – No.
Klepack
moved the following resolution, seconded by Brown:
VILLAGE OF LANSING PLANNING BOARD RESOLUTION FOR SEQR REVIEW OF PROPOSED ACTION ADOPTED ON July 12, 2004
WHEREAS:
A. This matter involves consideration of the following proposed action: Special Permit No. 1915, Arleo Eye Institute to construct a 21,680sf medical office on the lot on the northwest corner of Warren Road and Uptown Road in the Human Health Services District, Tax Parcel No. 46.1-6-6.21; and
B. This proposed action is an Unlisted Action for which the Village of Lansing Planning Board is an involved agency for the purposes of environmental review; and
C. On July 12, 2004, the Village of Lansing Planning Board, in performing the lead agency function for its independent and uncoordinated environmental review in accordance with Article 8 of the New York State Environmental Conservation Law - the State Environmental Quality Review Act (“SEQR”), (i) thoroughly reviewed the Short Environmental Assessment Form (the “Short EAF”), Part I, and any and all other documents prepared and submitted with respect to this proposed action and its environmental review, (ii) thoroughly analyzed the potential relevant areas of environmental concern to determine if the proposed action may have a significant adverse impact on the environment, including the criteria identified in 6 NYCRR Section 617.7(c), and (iii) completed the Short EAF, Part II;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOW:
1. The Village of Lansing Planning Board, based upon (i) its thorough review of the Short EAF, Part I, and any and all other documents prepared and submitted with respect to this proposed action and its environmental review, (ii) its thorough review of the potential relevant areas of environmental concern to determine if the proposed action may have a significant adverse impact on the environment, including the criteria identified in 6 NYCRR Section 617.7(c), and (iii) its completion of the Short EAF, Part II, including the findings noted thereon (which findings are incorporated herein as if set forth at length), hereby makes a negative determination of environmental significance (“Negative Declaration”) in accordance with SEQR for the above referenced proposed action, and determines that neither a Full Environmental Assessment Form, nor an Environmental Impact Statement will be required; and
2. The Responsible Officer of the Village of Lansing Planning Board is hereby authorized and directed to complete and sign as required the Short EAF, Part III, confirming the foregoing Negative Declaration, which fully completed and signed Short EAF shall be attached to and made a part of this Resolution.
The vote on the foregoing motion was as follows:
AYES: Doris Brown, Phil Dankert, Ned Hickey,
Carol Klepack and Maria Stycos
NAYS: none
The motion carried.
Hickey
noted the Landscape Plan is still outstanding and will be needed for the next
meeting. The Village Engineer will also
need to approve the drainage. A Lighting
Plan is also required but can be submitted at a later date.
Other Business as Time
Permits:
Hickey
has received a call from Clough-Harbour & Associates about Lansing Trails 2
regarding traffic concerns. He has set
up a meeting with the County Traffic Engineer, John Lampman, regarding what mitigation is proposed or is
available for the intersection of Bomax and Warren Roads. Hickey will attend the meeting and will make
sure the potential development of Bomax is also considered. Leopold would also like to see the
intersection of Craft Road and N. Triphammer Road addressed. Hickey stated that when N. Triphammer Road is
reconstructed, there will be utilities in place should a traffic light be warranted
in that location in the future.
Hickey
also announced that the Village would be putting out bids for N. Triphammer
Road on July 12th. The bid
will be awarded on August 2nd.
Work will begin in September although there will be no major road
construction this year although the road may be resurfaced. Most of the construction will be next year
and will take the whole summer.
Stycos
asked about the traffic problem on Bomax Drive.
Hickey stated it is at failure or Level F, but only for a short period
of time in the afternoon. Hickey has
spoken with Planning Department Commissioner Marx and the Warren Road
Rehabilitation Plan is scheduled for 2006-2007.
The culprit is Borg Warner who releases their employees at the same time
and there is no platooning of vehicles.
Hickey stated there may be a requirement for a phasing in of units by
Jonson. The Board also discussed the
staggering of shifts by Borg Warner.
This issue was not addressed when the Post Office was built as the
Village did not have approval authority for that project.
Regarding
the Comprehensive Plan, Hickey will ask Willard to prepare all the
sections of Part 1 which have been
revised for review by Planning Board members.
Part 2 of the plan will be done after that.
Klepack
asked about the requirements for variable buffer strips. Curtis stated they are only permitted as an
option in the Commercial Low Traffic District and the buffer for the Human
Health Services District is toggled to that of the Commercial Low Traffic
District and therefore the variable buffer option is permitted in that District
as well. In either case permission to
use the variable buffer in lieu of the 75 ft. buffer is at the sole discretion
of the Planning Board. Hickey stated the applicant had to bring in both a plan
with the 75 foot buffer and another plan with the variable buffer to show there
was no increase in the impervious surfaces.
Curtis recommended the Board note the reasons why the variable size
buffer is approved for this or any development.
Brown
asked if there is any way to reduce the amount of paper received. Hickey stated he pulls the staples from the
set of plans, keeps what he needs, and recycles what he does not need. Hickey stated the engineer and Curtis need
the entire packet of plans, but that Board members do not need the full
package. Curtis stated some of the
materials submitted are only for himself and the engineer and Board members do
not receive the materials. Hickey and
Curtis will discuss this further.
Adjournment:
Klepack moved to adjourn at 9:50 P.M. Seconded by Dankert. All aye.