Planning Board Meeting
The meeting of the
Hickey opened the Public Comment.
John O’Neill,
There being no one else present who wished to speak, Stycos moved to close the Public Comment period. Seconded by Dankert. All aye.
SEQRA Procedures:
Hickey stated there are several administrative issues
which must be handled tonight. Dubow
began with SEQRA procedures. Dubow would
like to see the process formalized and simplified for unlisted actions under
SEQRA. Dubow has proposed a sample resolution which must be filled in and
passed for a negative declaration. This
would replace the negative declaration document provided as a sample with the
SEQRA Law. Dubow has asked that the
Board members receive a copy of SEQRA Section 617.7c criteria for determining
significance prior to each meeting.
Dankert asked to receive it once and then he would attach it to his
files. Dubow suggested that the Planning
Board make a motion to adopt a negative declaration resolution rather than
simply signing the EAF. Basic
information for this document will be filled in prior to each meeting and the
rest will be completed at the meeting and made a part of the record. This then will get signed by the Clerk or
Clerk Part-Time of the Village and would be filed by Curtis along with the
SEQRA paperwork.
CLT Zoning Amendments:
Hickey has met with Dubow regarding proposed amendments to
the CLT District zoning requirements.
Dubow stated the proposed changes are to Article 145-42 (Zoning Law
202.07) of the CLT District. Dubow
recommended that the language regarding traffic generation proposed for the
“Intent” paragraph of Section 202.07 might be better located in section
304.05d. Hickey feels the CLT District
is the only area where traffic generation numbers are relevant. Klepack feels the language belongs in Section
202.07 which is about the CLT District.
Hickey would like to see traffic generation become a part of General
Conditions. The sentence on traffic
generation will be removed as the issue has already been dealt with
elsewhere. The “Intent” will include the
sentence that all proposed buildings should conform to the applicable
architectural and design guidelines.
Curtis stated it is important to reference specific guidelines where
applicable. The reference to specific
guidelines can be included on the building permit application form as well as
to the “Intent” Section 202.07 of the Zoning Law.
The next item was uses permitted with a Special
Permit. There are specific uses listed
for the use “office/studio/service” and this is not consistent with other
sections of the Zoning Law where specific uses are not listed. The Zoning Law Section 603 definition for
office/studio/service is very broad. The
Board felt it would clarify the permitted uses to remove restaurant uses from
office/studio/service. Hickey
recommended making specific categories for them in both the CLT and CHT
Districts, as well as in the B & T Park with additional conditions. Zoning Law Section 202.07 would include
restaurant as a new permitted use. There
was much discussion of the different types of restaurants. Restaurants such as Pizza Hut and the Chinese
restaurants would be considered sit-down restaurants even though they have
provision for call-in orders. Curtis noted that the percentage of area for
sit-down eating would be higher in a sit-down restaurant than that of a carry-out restaurant like Rogans which only
has limited seating and is more directed toward call-in, carry-out and delivery
business. Only sit-down restaurants
would be permitted in the CLT district
and all restaurant types (sit-downs, carry-outs, and drive-throughs) would be
permitted in CHT. Curtis will do more
research on this topic. In summary,
office/studio/service will be defined in Section 603 and the two levels of
restaurants will be removed from the office/studio/service category and
designated as a separate categories of use.
The next section discussed was light
manufacturing/technology. Dubow has
reviewed Sections 603 and 202.07 of the Zoning Law. There is reference to light manufacturing
type uses in Sections 603.32, 603.33 and 603.34. He is confused as to how to blend or
differentiate the sections. Curtis
suggested removing scientific instruments from Section 603.32. The Board is interested in recognizing as a
separate category some of the new high
technology businesses that have fewer employees and require little or no
tractor trailer traffic. Hickey recommended the title be low-impact technology
rather than light manufacturing. Klepack feels the number of employees should
be proportional to the lot size or area of the building. Curtis stated the law already allows for
limiting the number of parking spaces per a set amount of building area based
on occupancy. The Board chose to
eliminate the provision limiting number of
employees and rely instead on limiting parking spaces based on size of
building. Curtis recommended the
low-impact technology be added to Section 203.04 as a use requiring one parking
space for each 300 sf of gross floor area.
Hickey noted that Section 202.10 is the University
Research/Design District and would only include the Ornithology Lab. Section 603.34 defining University
Research/Design simply refers back to Section 202.10. It should at least
indicate that Ornithology Lab is a permitted use.
Hickey stated there are problems with the Design
Guildelines for N. Triphammer Road 25 ft. build-to line. The questionable part of the guideline is
when a building is parallel to the road but part of it is recessed, can there
be parking in the recessed area? Hickey
feels there is no parking in the front yard so therefore there can not be
parking in the recessed area. Curtis
stated that if the guidelines were changed to state that on the side where the
building has frontage there could be no parking between the building and the
road right-of-way which would clear up the issue – no parking would be
permitted in front of the building whether it was in the required front yard or
not. Dubow stated this would also need
to be changed in the Zoning Law as well as the Design Guidelines. Curtis will send recommended changes to
Dubow.
Regarding the permitted height of signs in the CLT, the
Board discussed changing the size to 15 feet rather than 20 feet for the CLT
District. There are currently no signs higher than 15 feet in the District.
The Board then discussed the minimum distance between
driveways. The Design Guidelines state
the minimum distance between driveways should be 30 feet and the Zoning Law
states 20 feet. The Zoning Law will
remain at 20 feet.
Lansing Trails
Tour:
Hickey
reminded Board members that Larry Fabronni and Ivar Jonson would be available
to provide an informational trip to tour the proposed Lansing Trails II
property. The tour will be leaving from
the west end of Bomax Drive on June 10th. There is to be no discussion between Board
members.
Revised Subdivision and
Zoning Laws:
Squeaky Clean Update:
Curtis reported that the BZA did not grant the variance
requests. There were 2 parking variances as well as one for front
yard setback on Catherwood Road and for side yard setback to the west. Curtis stated the BZA concluded that the
applicant was trying to fit too much onto the lot. Gary Sloan, owner of Squeaky Clean, has since
called the office to suggest ways the number of variances requested could be
reduced. Hickey did state that drainage
could have been improved by placing a drainage pipe in this area to clean up
the area between Squeaky Clean and Lansing Village Place. Dubow stated the Board might want to think
about the manner in which they would like to handle matters which involve both
variances and special permits and therefore must go before both the BZA and the
Planning Board. Dubow feels it may in
some cases be more appropriate that the BZA make a decision first.
Reports:
Trustees: Hickey attended the short meeting. Proposed Local Law B regarding Cluster
Subdivisions was passed and will be in effect in 10 days. Bolton Point Water Plant gave a presentation
on the proposed addition to its East Shore Drive plant and received the support
of the Village. The minutes were not
approved as there was not a quorum of those present. Signature cards for Tompkins Trust Company
were updated.
Approval of Minutes – April
29:
Klepack
moved to accept the April 29th minutes as revised. Seconded by Stycos. All aye.
Other Business as Time
Permits:
Klepack will check with residents in her area for recommended names for the road from the west boundary of Northwood Apartments to Coventry Walk.
Adjournment:
Kleapck moved to adjourn the meeting at 9:45 P.M. Seconded by Dankert. All aye.